Vendor and remote access.
Who can connect, through which route, under whose approval and whether that access is still required.
Uriyel independently reviews the operational evidence around one connected site and determines what is Verified, Unverified, Missing or Conflicting.
No production changes. No passwords required. No penetration testing.
The Sprint is deliberately narrow. We review what the organisation and its appointed providers can demonstrate, not what a policy document says should exist.
Who can connect, through which route, under whose approval and whether that access is still required.
Named owners, decision rights, escalation routes and responsibility for the connected environment.
Who can isolate or disable the relevant system, and what evidence supports that authority.
Restoration records, tests, responsible parties, exceptions and owner acceptance.
Vendor provenance, support route, lifecycle position, end-of-life exposure and accepted exceptions.
What changed, when it changed, who authorised it and which records support the current position.
A Proof Sprint does not manufacture confidence. It separates supported facts from unsupported assumptions.
The required evidence supports the operational claim for the defined scope.
A claim exists but sufficient supporting evidence has not been produced.
The required record, authority, evidence or recovery proof is not available.
Available records, dates, approvals or responsibilities disagree.
The output is designed to be useful to management, facilities teams and technical providers without turning the engagement into another oversized consultancy report.
A concise management-level view of what is Verified, Unverified, Missing or Conflicting.
The operational claim, evidence supplied, finding and responsible party in one controlled record.
The missing or contradictory items that require remediation, clarification or an owner decision.
A portable controlled pack containing the reviewed evidence record, findings and unresolved items.
Live records are subject to a project-specific data position. Public demonstrations contain synthetic data only and remain separate from client environments.
Security and data handlingUriyel verifies operational evidence. It does not replace penetration testing, engineering, statutory inspection, security monitoring or formal certification. Cryptographic or tamper-evidence claims are made only where the implemented technical function has been explicitly tested and included in scope.
Review evidence boundaryFive working days from receipt of the agreed evidence set.